3.8 Article

Impact of vitamin D supplementation on C-reactive protein; a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

期刊

BMC NUTRITION
卷 4, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s40795-017-0207-6

关键词

Meta-analysis; Vitamin D supplementation; C-reactive protein

资金

  1. TWAS studentship of the Chinese Academy of Sciences

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BackgroundTo evaluate the effect of vitamin D supplementation on C-reactive protein (CRP) through a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized control trials (RCTs).MethodsPubMed-Medline, SCOPUS, Google Scholar and Web of Science databases were searched (up until April 2016) to identify RCTs evaluating the impact of vitamin D supplementation on CRP. We used random effects models (using DerSimonian-Laird method) as well as the generic inverse variance methods for quantitative data synthesis. For sensitivity analysis, we applied leave-one-out approach. To examine the heterogeneity we used I2 index. Registration code: CRD42016036932.ResultsAmong 1274 search items, 24 studies met the inclusion criteria in the final evaluation. Pooling the data together indicated a non-significant decrease in CRP level following administration of vitamin D (weighted mean difference [WMD] -0.26(mg/l), (95% CI -0.75 to 0.22, N=26 arms, heterogeneity p=0.042; I-2 54.2%). The WMDs for IL6 was 0.67 pg/ml, (95% CI 0.29 to 1.06, N=16 arms, heterogeneity p=0.234; I-2 19.1%), 0.43 pg/ml, (95% CI 0.08 to 1.05, N=26 arms, heterogeneity p=0.120; I-2 42.1%), for IL10, and -0.11 pg/ml, (95% CI -0.53 to 0.30, N=12 arms, heterogeneity p=0.423; I-2 9.2%) for TNF-alpha, 4.03 pg/ml, (95% CI 3.50 to 4.57, N=3 arms, heterogeneity p=0.752; I-2 8.1%) for adiponectin. Sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of the findings.ConclusionsThis study provided evidence that vitamin D supplementation had no impact on serum CRP, IL10, and TNF-alpha, while significantly increased serum IL6. We recommend RCTs with longer period of follow-up time (12 months) for future studies to provide explicit results.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据