4.8 Article

Pretreatment of guayule biomass using supercritical carbon dioxide-based method

期刊

BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY
卷 101, 期 24, 页码 9785-9791

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2010.07.069

关键词

Guayule; Cellulose; Pretreatment; Supercritical CO2; Explosion

资金

  1. Yulex Corporation (Carlsbad, CA)
  2. US Department of Agriculture under the Biomass Research and Development Initiative [68-3A75-7-610]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Guayule, a desert shrub harvested for commercial production of hypoallergenic latex and resins constitutes <20% of the biomass. Converting the remaining bagasse to biorefinery feedstock for value-added products is an optimal economic option. A supercritical CO2-based process had been developed previously for resin extraction. In this study, the feasibility of including a supercritical CO2-based bagasse pretreatment method was evaluated. The pretreatment involved: adding water to the bagasse, raising system temperature, pressurizing using supercritical CO2, holding the system for a period of time, and exploding the bagasse. The pretreated biomass was subjected to enzyme hydrolysis. The yields of released sugars were used as pretreatment effectiveness indicators. Supercritical method outperformed other methods and gave much higher overall sugar yields for guayule (as high as 77% for glucose and 86% for total reducing sugars through both pretreatment and hydrolysis, as compared to 50% for glucose and 52% for total sugars with the dilute-acid pretreatment and 36% for glucose and 52% for total sugars with the delignification pretreatment). The enzymatic hydrolyzates were tested on the cellulase-producing fungus Trichoderma reesei Rut C-30. No inhibitory/toxic effects were apparent in terms of cell growth, sugar consumption, and cellulase and xylanase production. The supercritical CO2-based method was found to be very promising for pretreatment of waste biomass as the feedstock for subsequent enzymatic hydrolysis and fermentation to produce value-added bioproducts. (c) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据