4.8 Article

Fermentative production of L(+)-lactic acid using hydrolyzed acorn starch, persimmon juice and wheat bran hydrolysate as nutrients

期刊

BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY
卷 101, 期 10, 页码 3642-3648

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2009.12.119

关键词

L(+)-lactic acid; Non-grain raw material; Acorn; Persimmon; Response surface methodology

资金

  1. National High Technology Research and Development Key Program of China [2008AA10Z339]
  2. Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University [NCET-06-0646]
  3. International Science and Technology Cooperation Program
  4. Key Sci-Tech Project of Hubei Province of China [2006AA201C47]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The use of hydrolyzed acorn starch as a novel carbon source for L(+)-lactic acid production was proposed. The effects of carbon-nitrogen ratio and growth factor on the fermentations were studied by single factor experiments, A lower carbon-nitrogen ratio could enhance L(+)-lactic acid production, and the expensive yeast extract could be replaced by the cheap persimmon juice providing growth factor for L(+)-lactic acid production when wheat bran hydrolysate was used as the nitrogen source. The dosages of wheat bran hydrolysate and persimmon juice in the medium were statistically optimized by response surface methodology (RSM). The yield of L(+)-lactic acid reached 45.78 g/100 g dry acorn with a final concentration of 57.61 +/- 1.37 g/l and a productivity of 1.60 +/- 0.12 g/l h when the batch fermentation was carried out in a 51 bioreactor under the optimal conditions of wheat bran hydrolysate 24.55 g/l and persimmon juice 12.30 g/l. Comparative batch fermentations using different raw materials such as acorn, cassava, corn and glucose showed that both the yield and the productivity of L(+)-lactic acid production were the highest when the hydrolyzed acorn starch was used as the carbon source. Therefore, the acorn could be used as a new substitute of grain raw material in L(+)-lactic acid production. (c) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据