4.5 Article

A novel anaerobic down-flow structured-bed reactor for long-term stable H2 energy production from wastewater

期刊

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/jctb.4754

关键词

biohydrogen; anaerobic fixed-bed reactor; natural inoculum; biomass accumulation; specific organic load; homoacetogenesis

资金

  1. Sao Paulo Research Foundation-FAPESP [2009/15984-0, 2009/17491-1]
  2. Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Sao Paulo (FAPESP) [09/15984-0] Funding Source: FAPESP

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUNDAnaerobic, upflow fixed-bed reactors have been considered suitable for the production of H-2 from wastewater because, in contrast to completely mixed reactors, they avoid the washout of H-2-producing microorganisms. However, the excessive growth and accumulation of biomass on the bed are unfavorable and cause a drastic drop in biogas production, even though the fermentative process in the liquid medium continues unimpeded. This paper proposes a novel anaerobic fixed-bed reactor configuration intended to control the accumulation of biomass by means of structuring the bed longitudinally and inverting the flow (down-flow). RESULTSThree anaerobic, down-flow structured-bed reactors (ADSBRs) with different support materials for the attachment of microorganisms were operated continuously with and without frequent biomass discharges. The H-2 flow was continuously maintained for 120 days, resulting in a volumetric production of 0.6 L H-2 L-1 d(-1) and a yield of 0.5 mol H-2 mol(cs)(-1). Compared with the anaerobic, upflow fixed-bed reactor, the ADSBR increased by 10% the natural removal of biomass induced by the effluent and decreased by 15% the accumulated biomass in the bed. CONCLUSIONHence, this study demonstrates that the ADSBR produces H-2 continuously and stably due to the constant renewal of biomass; furthermore, young biomass exhibited more H-2-producing microorganisms than either non-producing or H-2-consuming microorganisms. (c) 2015 Society of Chemical Industry

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据