4.4 Article

Ubiquitous learning ecologies for a critical cyber-citizenship

期刊

COMUNICAR
卷 26, 期 54, 页码 49-58

出版社

GRUPO COMUNICAR
DOI: 10.3916/C54-2018-05

关键词

Lifelong learning; ubiquitous learning; learning ecologies; expanded education; soft skills; semantic network; critic citizenship; social change

资金

  1. ECOEC: Learning ecologies in multiple contexts: analysis of expanded learning and citizenship building projects [EDU2014-51961-P]
  2. Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (ERDF funds)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The aim of this research is to identify and analyse the ubiquitous learning acquired though blending education settings devoted to the lifelong training of trainers and how these contribute to the development of a conscious, critic and engaged citizenship. Through active exploration of the learning process, the study analyses the soft skills acquired which enhance performance in work and daily life, with the purpose of detecting the process of ubiquitous learning often overlooked in formal education. To this end, the study case presented here draws upon a data triangulation of qualitative and quantitative multisource information (questionnaires, interviews, participant observation, discussion groups, individual and collective diaries) which includes the study of the semantic networks consisting of learners' own utterances. The results obtained indicate that the soft skills related to the capacity of self-development, the use of innovative resources, the enhancement of social cooperation, the ability to meet cognitive and social challenges, and the functional learning as produced though expanded learning, have the potential to pave the way for the empowerment of peoples, communities and social movements. But this form of expanded learning, as open, collaborative, democratic and committed learning, must be actively supported if future generations are not only to be consumers but also cooperative producers in a socially shared world.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据