4.6 Article

STAT3 as a common signal of ischemic conditioning: a lesson on rigor and reproducibility in preclinical studies on cardioprotection

期刊

BASIC RESEARCH IN CARDIOLOGY
卷 113, 期 1, 页码 1-18

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00395-017-0660-z

关键词

Infarct size; Pigs; Reperfusion

资金

  1. German Research Foundation [He 1320/18-3]
  2. EU [COST Action CA16225]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Ischemic conditioning before (ischemic preconditioning, IPC) or after (ischemic postconditioning, POCO) sustained myocardial ischemia/reperfusion (I/R), induced locally or remotely from the heart (remote IPC, RIPC), reduces infarct size. However, none of the identified signaling steps of ischemic conditioning was robust across models and species to be successfully translated to humans. In prior separate studies in pigs, activation of signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3) was causal for infarct size reduction by IPC, POCO, and RIPC but it remains unclear whether or not STAT3 is truly a common denominator of cardioprotective signaling. We therefore, now analyzed the phosphorylation of STAT3 and other signaling proteins in left ventricular biopsies from our prior studies on IPC, POCO and RIPC in one approach. We developed a strategy for the quantification of protein phosphorylation in multiple samples from many experiments on different gels/membranes by Western blot. Along with reduced infarct size, the ratio of STAT3(tyr705) phosphorylation/total STAT3 protein at early reperfusion was significantly increased by IPC (IPC 2.0 +/- 0.3 vs. I/R 1.2 +/- 0.2 arbitrary units), but only trendwise by POCO and RIPC (1.3 +/- 0.2; 1.4 +/- 0.2 arbitrary units); storage time for IPC samples was shorter than for POCO and RIPC samples. No other signaling protein phosphorylation was associated with reduced infarct size. We confirmed STAT3 phosphorylation with IPC. For POCO and RIPC we could not reproduce the findings from our earlier more focused studies. At this point, we can not distinguish between lack of robustness of the biological signal and methodological issues of our retrospective approach.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据