4.8 Article

Changes in the bacterial community structure in two-stage constructed wetlands with different plants for industrial wastewater treatment

期刊

BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY
卷 100, 期 13, 页码 3228-3235

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2009.02.033

关键词

Bacterial communities; Constructed wetlands; Phragmites australis; Typha latifolia; Tannery wastewater

资金

  1. Fundacao para a Ciencia e Tecnologia (FCT), Portugal [SFRH/BDE/15507/2004, SFRH/BPD/21384/ 2005, SFRH/BD/19433/2004]
  2. [POCI/AMB/60126/2004]
  3. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [SFRH/BDE/15507/2004, SFRH/BD/19433/2004, SFRH/BPD/21384/2005, POCI/AMB/60126/2004] Funding Source: FCT

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study focused on the diversity of bacterial communities from two series of two-stage constructed wetlands (CWs) treating tannery wastewater, under different hydraulic conditions. Series were separately planted with Typha latifolia and Phragmites australis in expanded clay aggregates and operated for 31 months. The effect of plant species, hydraulic loading and unit stage on bacterial communities was addressed through bacterial enumeration and denaturating gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE). Diverse and distinct bacterial communities were found in each system unit, which was related in part to the type of plant and stage position (first or second unit in the series). Numerical analysis of DGGE profiles showed high diversity in each unit with an even distribution of species. No clear relation was established between the sample collection time, hydraulic loading applied and the bacterial diversity. Isolates retrieved from plant roots and substrates of CWs were affiliated with gamma-Proteobacteria, Firmicutes, alpha-Proteobacteria, Sphingobacteria, Actinobacteria and Bacteroidetes. Both series were effective in removing organic matter from the inlet wastewater, however, based on batch degradation experiments it seems that biodegradation was limited by the recalcitrant properties of the wastewater. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据