4.8 Article

Effect of xylanase supplementation of cellulase on digestion of corn stover solids prepared by leading pretreatment technologies

期刊

BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY
卷 100, 期 18, 页码 4203-4213

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2008.11.057

关键词

Pretreatment; Enzymatic hydrolysis; Cellulase; Xylanase; Leverage

资金

  1. US Department of Energy [DE-FG36-04GO14017]
  2. National Institute of Standards and Technology [60NANB1D0064]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Solids resulting from pretreatment of corn stover by ammonia fiber expansion (AFEX), ammonia recycled percolation (ARP), controlled PH, dilute acid, lime, and sulfur dioxide (SO2) technologies were hydrolyzed by enzyme cocktails based on cellulase supplemented with beta-glucosidase at an activity ratio of 1:2, respectively, and augmented with LIP to 11.0 g xylanase protein/g cellulase protein for combined cellulase and beta-glucosidase mass loadings of 14.5 and 29.0 mg protein (about 7.5 and 15 FPU, respectively)/g of original potential glucose, It Was found that glucose release increased nearly linearly with residual xylose removal by enzymes for all pretreatments despite substantial differences in their relative yields. The ratio of the fraction of glucan removed by enzymes to that for xylose was defined as leverage and correlated statistically at two combined cellulase and beta-glucosidase mass loadings with pretreatment type. However, no direct relationship Was found between leverage and solid features following different pretreatments Such as residual xylan or acetyl content. However, acetyl content not only affected how xylanase impacted cellulase action but also enhanced accessibility of cellulose and/or cellulase effectiveness, as determined by hydrolysis with Purified CBHI (Cel7A). Statistical modeling showed that cellulose crystallinity, among the main Substrate features, played a vital role ill Cellulase-xylanase interactions. and a mechanism is Suggested to explain the incremental increase in glucose release with xylanase supplementation. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据