4.8 Article

Adsorptive features of acid-treated olive stones for drin pesticides: Equilibrium, kinetic and thermodynamic modeling studies

期刊

BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY
卷 100, 期 18, 页码 4147-4155

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2009.04.003

关键词

Pesticide removal; Acid treated olive stones; Isotherms; Kinetics; Stir bar sorptive extraction

资金

  1. Ministry of Science and Innovation (Spain)
  2. National Plan of Scientific Research, Development and Technological Innovation [CGL2006-11646/HID]
  3. Spanish Agency for International Development Cooperation (AECID)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The adsorption behavior of drin pesticides from aqueous solution onto acid treated olive stones (ATOS) was investigated using stir bar sorptive extraction and gas chromatography coupled with mass spectroscopy. The effects of sorbent particle size, adsorbent dose, contact time, concentration of pesticide solution and temperature on the adsorption processes were systematically studied in batch shaking sorption experiments. Maximum removal efficiency (94.8%) was reached for aldrin (0.5 mg L-1) using the fraction 63-100 mu m of ATOS (solid/liquid ratio: 1 g L-1). Experimental data were modeled by Langmuir, Freundlich and Dubinin-Radushkevich (D-R) isotherms. The Freundlich isotherm model (R-2 = 0.98-0.99) fitted the equilibrium data better than the Langmuir and D-R isotherm models, with low sum of error values (SE = 1.4-9.2%). The mean adsorption free energy derived from the D-R isotherm model (R-2 = 0.95-0.99) showed that the adsorption of drin pesticides was taken place by weak physical forces, such as van der Waals forces and hydrogen bonding. The calculated thermodynamic parameters, Delta H, Delta S and Delta G prove that drin pesticides adsorption on ATOS was feasible, spontaneous and exothermic under examined conditions. The pseudo first order, pseudo second order kinetic and the intra-particle diffusion models were used to describe the kinetic data and rate constants were evaluated. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据