4.2 Review

A survey on mining stack overflow: question and answering (Q&A) community

期刊

DATA TECHNOLOGIES AND APPLICATIONS
卷 52, 期 2, 页码 190-247

出版社

EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1108/DTA-07-2017-0054

关键词

Mining; Software development; Information retrieval; Text mining; Software repositories; Stack overflow

资金

  1. National 863 Project, China [2015AA015404]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose Software developers extensively use stack overflow (SO) for knowledge sharing on software development. Thus, software engineering researchers have started mining the structured/unstructured data present in certain software repositories including the Q&A software developer community SO, with the aim to improve software development. The purpose of this paper is show that how academics/practitioners can get benefit from the valuable user-generated content shared on various online social networks, specifically from Q&A community SO for software development. Design/methodology/approach A comprehensive literature review was conducted and 166 research papers on SO were categorized about software development from the inception of SO till June 2016. Findings Most of the studies revolve around a limited number of software development tasks; approximately 70 percent of the papers used millions of posts data, applied basic machine learning methods, and conducted investigations semi-automatically and quantitative studies. Thus, future research should focus on the overcoming existing identified challenges and gaps. Practical implications The work on SO is classified into two main categories; SO design and usage and SO content applications. These categories not only give insights to Q&A forum providers about the shortcomings in design and usage of such forums but also provide ways to overcome them in future. It also enables software developers to exploit such forums for the identified under-utilized tasks of software development. Originality/value The study is the first of its kind to explore the work on SO about software development and makes an original contribution by presenting a comprehensive review, design/usage shortcomings of Q&A sites, and future research challenges.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据