3.8 Review

Preterm Birth: Long Term Cardiovascular and Renal Consequences

期刊

CURRENT PEDIATRIC REVIEWS
卷 14, 期 4, 页码 219-226

出版社

BENTHAM SCIENCE PUBL LTD
DOI: 10.2174/1573396314666180813121652

关键词

Preterm infant; small for gestational age; preeclampsia; antenatal glucocorticoids; nephron number; hypertension; cardiovascular disease; chronic kidney disease; DOHaD; programming; noncommunicable diseases; adult

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Cardiovascular and chronic kidney diseases are a part of non-communicable chronic diseases, the leading causes of premature death worldwide. They are recognized as having early origins through altered developmental programming, due to adverse environmental conditions during development. Preterm birth is such an adverse factor. Rates of preterm birth increased in the last decades, however, with the improvement in perinatal and neonatal care, a growing number of preterm born subjects has now entered adulthood. Clinical and experimental evidence suggests that preterm birth is associated with impaired or arrested structural or functional development of key organs/systems making preterm infants vulnerable to cardiovascular and chronic renal diseases at adulthood. This review analyzes the evidence of such cardiovascular and renal changes, the role of perinatal and neonatal factors such as antenatal steroids and potential pathogenic mechanisms, including developmental programming and epigenetic alterations. Conclusion: Preterm born subjects are exposed to a significantly increased risk for altered cardiovascular and renal functions at young adulthood. Adequate, specific follow-up measures remain to be determined. While antenatal steroids have considerably improved preterm birth outcomes, repeated therapy should be considered with caution, as antenatal steroids induce long-term cardiovascular and metabolic alterations in animals' models and their involvement in the accelerated cellular senescence observed in human studies cannot be excluded.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据