4.8 Article

Mg(OH)2 Supported Nanoscale Zero Valent Iron Enhancing the Removal of Pb(II) from Aqueous Solution

期刊

ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES
卷 7, 期 15, 页码 7961-7969

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/am509184e

关键词

nanoscale zerovalent iron (nZVI); magnesium hydroxide; nZVI@Mg(OH)(2) composite; synergistic sequestration

资金

  1. National Basic Research Program of China [2013CB934302, 2014CB932101]
  2. Chinese Academy of Sciences [XDA09030203]
  3. National Science Foundation [21477128]
  4. Technology Key Project of Fujian Province [2013H0058]
  5. [21125730]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this article, a novel composite (Mg(OH)(2) supported nanoscale zerovalent iron (denoted a nZVI@Mg-(OH)(2)) was prepared and characterized by X-ray diffraction, scanning electron microscopy, and transmission electron Microscopy method: The morphology analysis revealed that Mg(OH)(2) appeared as self-supported flower-like spheres, and nano Fe-0 particles were uniformly immobilized on the surface of their flower petals, thus aggregation of Fe-0 particles was minimized. Then the Pb(II)) removal performance was tested by batch experiments: The composite presented. exceptional removal capacity (1986.6 mg/g) compared with Mg(OH)(2) and nanoscale zerovalent iron due to the synergistic effect. Mechanisms were also explored by a comparative study of the phase, morphology, and surface valence state of composite before and after reaction, indicating that at least three paths are involved in the synergistic removal process: (1) Pb(II) adsorption by Mg(OH)(2) (companied with ion exchange reaction); (2) Pb(II) reduction to Pb by nanoscale zerovalent iron; and (3) Pb(II) precipitation as,Pb(OH)(2). The hydroxies provided by Mg(OH)(2) can dramatically promote the role of nanoscale zerovalent iron as reducer, thus greatly enhancing the whole Pb(II) sequestration process. The excellent performance shown in our research potentially provides an alternative technique for Pb(II) pollution treatment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据