4.3 Article

An empirical study of green' workplace behaviours: ability, motivation and opportunity

期刊

ASIA PACIFIC JOURNAL OF HUMAN RESOURCES
卷 56, 期 1, 页码 56-78

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/1744-7941.12151

关键词

Green human resource management; Pro-environmental behaviours; Sustainability; Environmental management

资金

  1. Monash University
  2. Monash University Human Research Ethics Committee (MUHREC) [CF13/613 - 2013000268]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Green human resource management contributes to an understanding of the role of human resource management (HRM) towards sustainability and environmental outcomes. This paper assesses employees' environmental knowledge as well as self-perceptions of ability, motivation and opportunity (AMO) to practise green behaviours by operationalising the AMO framework towards a pro-environmental agenda. The study draws on a survey sample of 394 employees from five organisations in regional Australia. Key findings show that pro-environmental AMO are positively associated with green behaviours and that these are more prevalent at home than in the workplace. Further, line managers moderate the relationship between pro-environmental AMO and green behaviour although not the relationship between environmental knowledge and green behaviour. Such benchmark measurement informs HRM policies, practices and interventions and contributes to environmental management. Key points Promoting a green culture and behaviours that eliminate or reduce harm to the environment have been shown to benefit organisations in a multitude of ways. Pro-environmental AMO predicts green behaviours and these behaviours are more prevalent at home than in the workplace. Line managers moderate the relationship between pro-environmental AMO and green behaviour although not the relationship between environmental knowledge and green behaviour. Benchmark measurement using such an AMO tool can inform future HRM policies, practices and interventions that can contribute to environmental management.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据