4.5 Article

Fabrication of a circular PDMS microchannel for constructing a three-dimensional endothelial cell layer

期刊

BIOPROCESS AND BIOSYSTEMS ENGINEERING
卷 36, 期 12, 页码 1871-1878

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00449-013-0961-z

关键词

Polydimethylsiloxane; Circular microchannels; Cell culture; Reflow of photoresist; Human umbilical vein endothelial cells

资金

  1. Converging Research Center Program
  2. Ministry of Education, Science and Technology [2011K000864, 2011-0031357]
  3. Advanced Biomass R&D Center (ABC) of Global Frontier Project
  4. National Research Foundation of Korea [2011-0031357] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We describe a simple and efficient fabrication method for generating microfluidic channels with a circular cross-sectional geometry by exploiting the reflow phenomenon of a thick positive photoresist. Initial rectangular shaped positive photoresist micropatterns on a silicon wafer, which were fabricated by a conventional photolithography process, were converted into a half-circular shape by tuning the temperature to around 105 A degrees C. Through optimization of the reflow conditions, we could obtain a perfect circular micropattern of the positive photoresist, and control the diameter in a range from 100 to 400 mu m. The resultant convex half-circular photoresist was used as a template for fabricating a concave polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) through a replica molding process, and a circular PDMS microchannel was produced by bonding two half-circular PDMS layers. A variety of channel dimensions and patterns can be easily prepared, including straight, S-curve, X-, Y-, and T-shapes to mimic an in vivo vascular network. To form an endothelial cell layer, we cultured primary human umbilical vein endothelial cells inside circular PDMS microchannels, and demonstrated successful cell adhesion, proliferation, and alignment along the channel.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据