4.5 Article

Effect of bioconversion conditions on vanillin production by Amycolatopsis sp ATCC 39116 through an analysis of competing by-product formation

期刊

BIOPROCESS AND BIOSYSTEMS ENGINEERING
卷 37, 期 5, 页码 891-899

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00449-013-1060-x

关键词

Transformation condition; Vanillin production; Amycolatopsis sp ATCC 39116; An analysis of competing by-product formation; Streptomyces V1

资金

  1. Social Development and Scientific and Technological Plan in Shaanxi Province of China [693102]
  2. Science and technology projects in Xi'an of China [694180]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of China [GK201003002]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated the effects of transformation conditions such as initial pH, the initial concentration of glucose and yeast extract in the medium, and the separate addition of ferulic acid and vanillic acid, on the production of vanillin through an analysis of competing by-product formation by Amycolatopsis sp. ATCC 39116. The extent and nature of by-product formation and vanillin yield were affected by initial pH and different initial concentrations of glucose and yeast extract in the medium, with a high yield of vanillin and high cell density obtained at pH 8.0, 10 g/l glucose, and 8 g/l yeast extract. High concentrations of ferulic acid were found to negatively affect cell density. Additional supplementation of 100 mg/l vanillic acid, a metabolically linked by-product, was found to result in a high concentration of vanillin and guaiacol, an intermediate of vanillin. Via an analysis of the effect of these transformation conditions on competing by-product formation, high concentrations of ferulic acid were transformed with a molar yield to vanillin of 96.1 and 95.2 %, by Amycolatopsis sp. ATCC 39116 and Streptomyces V1, respectively, together with a minor accumulation of by-products. These are among the highest performance values reported in the literature to date for Streptomyces in batch cultures.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据