4.3 Article

L-DOPA-Induced Motor Impairment and Overexpression of Corticostriatal Synaptic Components Are Improved by the mGluR5 Antagonist MPEP in 6-OHDA-Lesioned Rats

期刊

ASN NEURO
卷 10, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/1759091418811021

关键词

Parkinson's disease; L-DOPA-induced dyskinesia; mGluR5; MPEP; postsynaptic densities

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81200970, 81671270, 81471338, 81671284]
  2. Changzhou Sci & Tech Program Grant [CJ20130046, CE20145045]
  3. Changzhou High-Level Medical Talents Training Project [2016CZBJ023, 2016CZLJ018]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Levodopa (L-DOPA) is still the most effective drug for the treatment of Parkinson's disease (PD). However, the long-term therapy often triggers L-DOPA-induced dyskinesia (LID). Metabotropic glutamate receptor type 5 (mGluR5) is abundant in the basal ganglia, and its inhibition is thought to modulate postsynaptic excitatory synaptic transmission and glutamate hyperactivity in PD and LID. In this report, we examined the effects of mGluR5-specific antagonist 2-methyl-6-(phenylethynyl)pyridine (MPEP) on LID and synaptic components in the PD model rat. We found the selective mGluR5 antagonist MPEP attenuated abnormal involuntary movements, prolonged the duration of rotational response, reversed the decrease of left forepaw adjusting steps, and reduced overexpression of striatal mGluR5 in the LID rats. Moreover, our results showed much thicker postsynaptic densities, narrower synapse cleft, as well as the increased ratio of perforated synapses induced by L-DOPA treatment, while coadministration of L-DOPA and MPEP reversed these postsynaptic effects. Finally, MPEP reduced overexpression of the two postsynaptic proteins (PSD-95 and SAP102) induced by L-DOPA treatment. Hence, these results provide evidence that aberrant neural plasticity at corticostriatal synapses in the striatum is closely correlated with the occurrence of LID, and targeted inhibition of mGluR5 by MPEP alleviates LID in the PD rat model.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据