3.8 Article

Body condition scores of European zoo elephants (Elephas maximus and Loxodonta africana): Status quo and influencing factors

期刊

JOURNAL OF ZOO AND AQUARIUM RESEARCH
卷 6, 期 3, 页码 91-103

出版社

EUROPEAN ASSOC ZOOS & AQUARIA

关键词

body condition scoring; zoo elephants

资金

  1. Karl und Louise Nicolai-Stiftung
  2. Zoo Zurich
  3. Zoo Basel

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Obesity is a common problem in captive elephants. Therefore, physical state monitoring presents a critical aspect in preventive elephant healthcare. Some institutions lack the equipment to weigh elephants regularly, so body condition scoring (BCS) is a valuable alternative tool. As yet, the BCS of both elephant species has not been assessed comprehensively for the European captive population. Using a previously validated visual BCS protocol, we assessed 192 African (Loxodonto ofricono) and 326 Asian elephants (Elephas moximus) living in European zoos (97% of the living European elephant population). The majority of elephants scored in the upper categories with 56% of adults assessed in the range 7-10 out of 10. Adult Asian elephants had significantly lower BCS (males: mean 6.2 +/- 1.0, median 6.0, range 4-8; females: mean 6.6 +/- 1.3, median 6.0, range 3-9) than African elephants (males: mean 6.7 +/- 0.7, median 6.0, range 6-8; females: mean 6.9 +/- 1.2, median 6.0, range 1-9). Comparison with samples of free-ranging populations (163 Asian elephants and 121 African elephants) revealed significantly lower scores in free-ranging elephants independent of species, age and sex category. Compared to previous reports from captive populations, the European zoo elephant population is nevertheless less obese. In adult Asian elephant females, BCS was significantly correlated to their breeding status with lower scores in current breeders; however, breeding status was also correlated to group size, enclosure size, and a diet with less vegetables. Further attention to zoo elephant weight management is recommended with regular longitudinal monitoring by body condition scoring.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据