4.7 Article

State-to-state reaction dynamics of 18O+32O2 studied by a time-dependent quantum wavepacket method

期刊

JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS
卷 142, 期 6, 页码 -

出版社

AMER INST PHYSICS
DOI: 10.1063/1.4907229

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Basic Research Program of China [2013CB922200]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21222308, 21103187, 21133006]
  3. Chinese Academy of Sciences
  4. Key Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences
  5. U.S. Department of Energy [DE-FG02-05ER15694]
  6. National Science Foundation [CHE-1300945]
  7. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  8. Division Of Chemistry [1300945] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The title isotope exchange reaction was studied by converged time-dependent wave packet calculations, where an efficient 4th order split operator was applied to propagate the initial wave packet. State-to-state differential and integral cross sections up to the collision energy of 0.35 eV were obtained with O-32(2) in the hypothetical j(0) = 0 state. It is discovered that the differential cross sections are largely forward biased in the studied collision energy range, due to the fact that there is a considerable part of the reaction occurring with large impact parameter and short lifetime relative to the rotational period of the intermediate complex. The oscillations of the forward scattering amplitude as a function of collision energy, which result from coherent contribution of adjacent resonances, may be a sensitive probe for examining the quality of the underlying potential energy surface. A good agreement between the theoretical and recent experimental integral and differential cross sections at collision energy of 7.3 kcal/mol is obtained. However, the theoretical results predict slightly too much forward scattering and colder rotational distributions than the experimental observations at collision energy of 5.7 kcal/mol. (C) 2015 AIP Publishing LLC.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据