3.8 Article

Urban Informal Housing and Surface Urban Heat Island Intensity: Exploring Spatial Association in the City of Mumbai

期刊

ENVIRONMENT AND URBANIZATION ASIA
卷 9, 期 2, 页码 158-177

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/0975425318783548

关键词

Surface urban heat island; slum urban form; land surface temperature; urbanization; spatial analysis; urban development

资金

  1. Ministry of Human Resource Development (MHRD), Government of India (GoI) project titled CoE-FAST [14MHRD005]
  2. IRCC-IIT Bombay Fund [16IRCC561015]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Urbanization leads to the densification of built-up areas, and thereby increases surface heat island intensity which is one of the growing concerns in the rapidly urbanizing cities. Another notable aspect of cities like Mumbai is the uncontrolled growth of informal slum housing clusters, which have emerged as a significant urban built form in the landscape of cities. This study presents a case of Mumbai that aims to explore the linkages between slum housing-here referred as 'slum urban form' (SUF)-and surface urban heat island (SUHI) supported by spatial-statistical analysis. The magnitude of the impact of urban form on SUHI, measured by land surface temperature (LST), is examined using Cohen's d index, which measures the effect size for two groups-SUF and 'formal' housing-on LST. The results confirm a 'large' effect indicating a significant difference in mean LST between the two groups. The spatial analysis reveals a statistically significant spatial clustering of LST and SUF (p-value < 0.05), and bivariate local indicator of spatial association (LISA) confirms that the spatial association of SUF is surrounded by 'high' LST (Moran I: 0.49). The exploratory spatial analysis indicates that the contribution of SUF in elevating SUHI intensity is more than the formal housing areas and has increased vulnerability to heat stress. The results were validated on the ground using environmental sensors, which confirms the susceptibility of SUF to heat stress.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据