4.2 Article

New Insights Into the Roles of Sulfated Glycosaminoglycans in Islet Amyloid Polypeptide Amyloidogenesis and Cytotoxicity

期刊

BIOPOLYMERS
卷 100, 期 6, 页码 645-655

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/bip.22243

关键词

islet amyloid polypeptide; amyloid; glycosaminoglycan; conformation; pancreatic beta-cells

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Glycosaminoglycans (GAGs) are found in association with virtually all extracellular protein deposits related to amyloid diseases. Particularly, GAGs were shown to enhance fibrillogenesis of the islet amyloid polypeptide (IAPP), a peptide hormone whose aggregation is associated with Type-II diabetes pathogenesis. However, the exact molecular mechanism by which GAGs enhance IAPP amyloidogenesis remains unclear as well as the implications of cell surface GAGs in IAPP-mediated cytotoxicity. The aim of this study was to gain conformational and thermodynamics insights about GAGs-IAPP interactions as a function of IAPP protonation state and buffer ionic strength as well as to explore the roles of cell surface GAGs in IAPP cytotoxicity. Isothermal titration calorimetry revealed that protonation of residue His 18 increases the binding affinity of IAPP towards heparin and, in turn, strongly stimulates fibrillogenesis. Interaction of IAPP with heparin induces a random coil to helix conformational conversion and the helical intermediates could be on-pathway to amyloid fibrils formation. Using rat beta-cells INS-1 that were enzymatically treated with GAG lyases and a CHO cell line that is deficient in the biosynthesis of GAGs, we observed that the lack of GAGs at the plasma membrane does not prevent IAPP-induced toxicity, whereas the presence of soluble heparin in the cell media inhibits IAPP cytotoxicity. Overall, this study reinforces the postulate that sulfated GAGs are actively implicated in IAPP amyloidogenic process in vivo, where they could play a protective role by interacting with cytotoxic species and converting them into less culprit amyloid fibrils. (C) 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据