4.7 Article

Mortality following new-onset Rheumatoid Arthritis: has modern Rheumatology had an impact?

期刊

ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES
卷 77, 期 1, 页码 85-91

出版社

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2017-212131

关键词

-

资金

  1. Swedish Research Council
  2. Swedish Foundation for Strategic Research
  3. Stockholm County Council (ALF)
  4. Heart Lung Foundation
  5. Karolinska Institutet (Strategic Research Area Epidemiology)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective To investigate if, and when, patients diagnosed with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in recent years are at increased risk of death. Methods Using an extensive register linkage, we designed a population-based nationwide cohort study in Sweden. Patients with new-onset RA from the Swedish Rheumatology Quality Register, and individually matched comparators from the general population were followed with respect to death, as captured by the total population register. Results 17 512 patients with new-onset RA between 1 January 1997 and 31 December 2014, and 78 847 matched general population comparator subjects were followed from RA diagnosis until death, emigration or 31 December 2015. There was a steady decrease in absolute mortality rates over calendar time, both in the RA cohort and in the general population. Although the relative risk of death in the RA cohort was not increased (HR=1.01, 95% CI 0.96 to 1.06), an excess mortality in the RA cohort was present 5 years after RA diagnosis (HR after 10 years since RA diagnosis=1.43 (95% CI 1.28 to 1.59)), across all calendar periods of RA diagnosis. Taking RA disease duration into account, there was no clear trend towards lower excess mortality for patients diagnosed more recently. Conclusions Despite decreasing mortality rates, RA continues to be linked to an increased risk of death. Thus, despite advancements in RA management during recent years, increased efforts to prevent disease progression and comorbidity, from disease onset, are needed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据