4.2 Article Proceedings Paper

Structural and Biochemical Characteristics of the Cyclotide Kalata B5 from Oldenlandia affinis

期刊

BIOPOLYMERS
卷 94, 期 5, 页码 647-658

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/bip.21409

关键词

cyclotide; cyclic peptide; cyclic cystine knot; kalata; hemolytic; NMR

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cyclotides are a large family of plant-derived proteins typified by their head-to-tail cyclic backbone and knotted arrangement of three disulfide bonds. Although they display a diverse range of biological activities; their native function is thought to be plant defense. Here we characterized the expression, three-dimensional structure, and hemolytic activity of the cyclotide kalata B5 from the African plant Oldenlandia affinis. Kalata B5 shows an interesting seasonal variation in its expression and can only be isolated during certain times of the year, when the plant is flowering. It displays a typical tightly folded cyclic cystine knot structure. A range of pH and temperature titrations reveal that a conserved glutamic acid in loop 1 of the structure forms a key hydrogen bond network, similar to that reported previously for other cyclotides. However, specific line broadening in the NMR spectra of kalata B5 suggests that the hydrogen bonding network in this peptide is less rigid than in other cyclotides. Notably, the pK(a) of Glu6 of 4.5 is higher than the values for other cyclotides studied so far, which range from 3.0 to 4.0, providing a further, indication of a weaker hydrogen bond network. Kalata B5 has only moderate hemolytic activity compared with other highly expressed cyclotides, and this reduced activity probably reflects its more flexible structure. As is the case with other cyclotides, kalata B5 has an exposed hydrophobic region on its surface, supporting suggestions that this hydrophobic patch is a key feature for membrane binding and biological activity of cyclotides. (c) 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Biopolymers (Pept Sci) 94: 647-658, 2010.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据