4.2 Article

Structural Analysis of the Human Cannabinoid Receptor One Carboxyl-Terminus Identifies Two Amphipathic Helices

期刊

BIOPOLYMERS
卷 91, 期 7, 页码 565-573

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/bip.21179

关键词

GPCR; cannabinoid receptor one; CB1 carboxyl-terminus; amphipathic alpha-helices

资金

  1. NIDA NIH HHS [R01 DA018428, R01 DA020763, DA020763, DA018428, R01 DA020763-02, R01 DA020763-01A2] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIGMS NIH HHS [GM082054] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Recent research has implicated the C-terminus of G-protein coupled receptors in key events such as receptor activation and subsequent intracellular sorting, yet obtaining structural information of the entire C-tail has proven a formidable task. Here, a peptide corresponding to the full-length C-tail of the human CB1 receptor (residues 400-472) was expressed in E.coli and purified in a soluble form. Circular dichroism (CD) spectroscopy revealed that the peptide adopts an alpha-helical conformation in negatively charged and zwitterionic detergents (48-51% and 36-38%, respectively), whereas it exhibited the CD signature of unordered structure at low concentration In aqueous solution. Interestingly, 27% helicity was displayed at high peptide concentration suggesting that self-association induces helix formation in the absence of a membrane mimetic. NMR spectroscopy of the doubly labeled (N-15- and C-13-) C-terminus in dodecylphosphocholine (DPC) identified two amphipathic alpha-helical domains. The first domain, S401-F412, corresponds to the helix 8 common to G protein-coupled receptors while the second domain, A440-M461, is a newly identified structural motif in the distal region of the carboxyl-terminus of the receptor. Molecular modeling of the C-tail in DPC indicates that both helices lie parallel to the plane of the membrane with their hydrophobic and hydrophilic faces poised for critical Interactions. (C) 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Biopolymers 91: 565-573, 2009.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据