4.2 Article

Conformational transitions of flanking purines in HIV-1 RNA dimerization initiation site kissing complexes studied by Charmm explicit solvent molecular dynamics

期刊

BIOPOLYMERS
卷 89, 期 9, 页码 732-746

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/bip.21001

关键词

HIV-1 dimerization initiation site; kissing complex; MD simulations; force field; stacking

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Dimerization of HIV-1 genomic RNA is initiated by kissing loop interactions at the Dimerization Initiation Site (DIS). Dynamics of purines that flank the 5' ends of 1 the loop-loop helix in HIV-1 DIS kissing complex were explored using explicit solvent molecular dynamics (MD) simulations with the CHARMM force field. Multiple MD simulations (200 ns in total) of X-ray structures for HTV-1 DIS Subtypes A, B, and F revealed conformational variability of flanking purines. In particular, the flanking purines, which in the starting X-ray structures are bulged-out and stack in pairs, formed a consecutive stack of four bulged-out adenines at the beginning of several simulations. This conformation is seen in the crystal structure of DIS Subtype F with no interference from crystal packing, and was frequently reported in our preceding MD studies performed with the AMBER force field. However, as CHARMM simulations progressed, the four continuously stacked adenines showed conformational transitions from the bulged-out into the bulged-in geometries. Although such an arrangement has not been seen in any X-ray structure, it has been suggested by a recent NMR investigation. In CHARMM simulations, in the longer time scale, the flanking purines display the tendency to move to bulged-in conformations. This is in contrast with the AMBER simulations, which indicate a modest prevalence for bulged-out flanking base positions in line with the X-ray data. The simulations also suggest that the intermolecular stacking between purines from the opposite hairpins can additionally stabilize the kissing complex. (C) 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据