4.5 Article

Ligand Mobility Regulates B Cell Receptor Clustering and Signaling Activation

期刊

BIOPHYSICAL JOURNAL
卷 106, 期 1, 页码 26-36

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2013.10.043

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Science Foundation (NSF) [1121710, 1206060]
  2. NSF ADVANCE program award
  3. ARCS fellowship
  4. Direct For Biological Sciences
  5. Div Of Molecular and Cellular Bioscience [1121710] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  6. Division Of Physics
  7. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [1206060] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Antigen binding to the B cell receptor (BCR) induces receptor clustering, cell spreading, and the formation of signaling microclusters, triggering B cell activation. Although the biochemical pathways governing early B cell signaling have been well studied, the role of the physical properties of antigens, such as antigen mobility, has not been fully examined. We study the interaction of B cells with BCR ligands coated on glass or tethered to planar lipid bilayer surfaces to investigate the differences in B cell response to immobile and mobile ligands. Using high-resolution total internal reflection fluorescence (TIRF) microscopy of live cells, we followed the movement and spatial organization of BCR clusters and the associated signaling. Although ligands on either surface were able to cross-link BCRs and induce clustering, B cells interacting with mobile ligands displayed greater signaling than those interacting with immobile ligands. Quantitative analysis revealed that mobile ligands enabled BCR clusters to move farther and merge more efficiently than immobile ligands. These differences in physical reorganization of receptor clusters were associated with differences in actin remodeling. Perturbation experiments revealed that a dynamic actin cytoskeleton actively reorganized receptor clusters. These results suggest that ligand mobility is an important parameter for regulating B cell signaling.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据