4.5 Article

Spatial Organization of EphA2 at the Cell-Cell Interface Modulates Trans-Endocytosis of EphrinA1

期刊

BIOPHYSICAL JOURNAL
卷 106, 期 10, 页码 2196-2205

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2014.03.043

关键词

-

资金

  1. Department of Defense National Defense Science and Engineering Graduate Fellowship
  2. American Chemical Society Irving S. Sigal Postdoctoral Fellowship
  3. Materials Sciences and Engineering Division of the U.S. Department of Energy [DE-AC02-05CH11231]
  4. Department of Defense [W81XWH-11-1-0256]
  5. National Institutes of Health National Cancer Institute Integrative Cancer Biology Program [1-U54-CA143836]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

EphA2 is a receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK) that is sensitive to spatial and mechanical aspects of the cell's microenvironment. Misregulation of EphA2 occurs in many aggressive cancers. Although its juxtacrine signaling geometry (EphA2's cognate ligand ephrinA1 is expressed on the surface of an apposing cell) provides a mechanism by which the receptor may experience extracellular forces, this also renders the system challenging to decode. By depositing living cells on synthetic supported lipid membranes displaying ephrinA1, we have reconstituted key features of the juxtacrine EphA2-ephrinA1 signaling system while maintaining the ability to perturb the spatial and mechanical properties of the membrane-cell interface with precision. In addition, we developed a trans-endocytosis assay to monitor internalization of ephrinA1 from a supported membrane into the apposing cell using a quantitative three-dimensional fluorescence microscopy assay. Using this experimental platform to mimic a cell-cell junction, we found that the signaling complex is not efficiently internalized when lateral reorganization at the membrane-cell contact sites is physically hindered. This suggests that EphA2-ephrinA1 trans-endocytosis is sensitive to the mechanical properties of a cell's microenvironment and may have implications in physical aspects of tumor biology.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据