4.7 Article

Relation Between Awe and Environmentalism: The Role of Social Dominance Orientation

期刊

FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY
卷 9, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02367

关键词

awe; self-transcendent emotion; social dominance orientation; environmentalism; environmental engagement

资金

  1. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2017M621509]
  2. Key Projects of Philosophy and Social Sciences Research of the Chinese Ministry of Education [13JZD048]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31671160]
  4. Education Project for Young Scholar, Shanghai Planning Project of Philosophy and Social Sciences [B1804]
  5. National Social Science Fund [17BSH093]
  6. Project of Philosophy and Social Sciences in Shanghai [2015BSH004]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The present study attempts to explore the effect of awe on environmentalism and the mediating role of social dominance orientation in generating this effect. In Study 1, a series of questionnaires were used to investigate the correlation among trait awe, social dominance orientation, and ecological behavior. Results demonstrated that, while trait awe was positively correlated with ecological behavior, it was partially mediated by social dominance orientation. In follow-up studies, two priming experiments were conducted to test the causal relationship and the psychological mechanisms between awe and environmentalism. Results revealed that inductions of awe (relative to various control states) decreased participants' social dominance orientation, which in turn partially enhanced their willingness to make personal sacrifices for the environment (Study 2), and intentions to engage in pro-environmental behavior (Study 3). This study not only corroborates the critical role of awe in promoting environmentalism, but also highlights the importance of social dominance orientation in explaining why awe increases environmentalism. Implications and future directions were also discussed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据