4.6 Article

Bioactive Heterometallic Cu-II-Zn-II Complexes with Potential Biomedical Applications

期刊

ACS OMEGA
卷 3, 期 10, 页码 13343-13353

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.8b01260

关键词

-

资金

  1. UGC, India [UGC/689/JrFellow(Sc)]
  2. FEDER [CTQ2015-66164-R]
  3. Ministerio de Economia y Competitividad (Spain)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A series of multinudear heterometallic Cu-Zn complexes of molecular formula [(CuL)(2)Zn(dca)(2)] (1), [(CuL)(2)Zn(NO3)(2)] (2), [(CuL)(2)Zn-2(Cl)(4)] (3), and [(CuL)(2)Zn-2(NO2)(4)] (4) have been synthesized by reacting [CuL] as a metalloligand (ML) (where HL = N,N'-bis(5-chloro-2-hydroxybenzylidene)-2,2-dimethylpropane-1,3-diamine) and by varying the anions or coligands using the same molar ratios of the reactants. All of the four products including the ML have been characterized by infrared and UV-vis spectroscopies and elemental and single-crystal X-ray diffraction analyses. By varying the anions, different d topologies are obtained which we have tried to rationalize by means of thorough density ftinctional theory calculations. All of the complexes (1-4) have now been applied for several biological investigations to verify their therapeutic worth. First, their cytotoxicity properties were assessed against HeLa human cervical carcinoma along with the determination of IC50 values. The study was extended with extensive DNA and protein binding experiments followed by detailed fluorescence quenching study with suitable reagents to comprehend the mechanistic pathway. From of these biological studies, it has been found that all of these heterometallic complexes show more than a few fold improvement of their therapeutic values as compared to the similar homometallic ones probably because of the simultaneous synergic effect of copper and zinc. Among all of the four heterometallic complexes, complex 3 exhibits highest binding constants and IC50 values suggest for their better interaction toward the biological targets and hence have better clinical importance.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据