4.6 Article

Dispersing Metallic Platinum on Green Rust Enables Effective and Selective Hydrogenation of Carbonyl Group in Cinnamaldehyde

期刊

ACS OMEGA
卷 3, 期 10, 页码 12778-12787

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.8b02114

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2016YFB0601303, 2016YFB0301602]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21776017, 21521005]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Layered double hydroxides (LDHs), a category of two-dimensional nanostructured layered materials, can be employed widely as supports, catalyst precursors, and actual catalysts in a variety of heterogeneous catalytic reactions. In this work, we reported a series of Fe-containing LDHs-supported Pt-based catalysts for base-free selective hydrogenation of cinnamaldehyde into cinnamyl alcohol. It was revealed that their catalytic performances were closely correlated to the compositions of LDH supports. Especially, highly selective hydrogenation of cinnainaldehyde could be achieved over the Fe(II)-Fe(III)-LDH (green rust, FeFe-LDH) supported Pt catalyst, with a high cinnamyl alcohol selectivity of about 921 at a conversion of 90% after a reaction of 2 h, superior to other Fe(III)-containing LDHs (e.g., NiFe-LDH, CoFe-LDH, and ZnFe-LDH) supported Pt ones. It was demonstrated that the high catalytic efficiency of Pt/FeFe-LDH mainly originated from highly electron-rich character of metallic Pt species and the presence of surface reductive Fe2+ species, thereby being helpful for the chemisorption and activation of carbonyl group in cinnamaldehyde. Moreover, strong interactions between green rust matrix and metallic Pt species could stabilize the surface Pt nanoparticles, thereby inhibiting the metal leaching during the above reaction. The present study illustrates the validity of support control in supported Pt catalysts via tuning the compositions of LDHs, and thus the electronic structure of active metal sites and catalytic performance in the selective hydrogenation of cinnamaldehyde.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据