4.5 Article

Single-Molecule Imaging Reveals Aβ42:Aβ40 Ratio-Dependent Oligomer Growth on Neuronal Processes

期刊

BIOPHYSICAL JOURNAL
卷 104, 期 4, 页码 894-903

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2012.12.051

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health (NIH) [R21-AG033749, R21-G027370]
  2. University of Michigan MSTP [T32-GM07863]
  3. Molecular Biophysics Training Grant [T32-GM08270]
  4. Biology of Aging Training Grant [T32-AG000114]
  5. Div Of Biological Infrastructure
  6. Direct For Biological Sciences [0959823] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Soluble oligomers of the amyloid-beta peptide have been implicated as proximal neurotoxins in Alzheimer's disease. However, the identity of the neurotoxic aggregate(s) and the mechanisms by which these species induce neuronal dysfunction remain uncertain. Physiologically relevant experimentation is hindered by the low endogenous concentrations of the peptide, the metastability of A beta oligomers, and the wide range of observed interactions between A beta and biological membranes. Single-molecule microscopy represents one avenue for overcoming these challenges. Using this technique, we find that A beta binds to primary rat hippocampal neurons at physiological concentrations. Although amyloid-beta(1-40) as well as amyloid-beta(1-42) initially form larger oligomers on neurites than on glass slides, a 1:1 mix of the two peptides result in smaller neurite-bound oligomers than those detected on-slide or for either peptide alone. With 1 nM peptide in solution, A beta 40 oligomers do not grow over the course of 48 h, A beta 42 oligomers grow slightly, and oligomers of a 1:1 mix grow substantially. Evidently, small A beta oligomers are capable of binding to neurons at physiological concentrations and grow at rates dependent on local A beta 42:A beta 40 ratios. These results are intriguing in light of the increased A beta 42:A beta 40 ratios shown to correlate with familial Alzheimer's disease mutations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据