4.6 Article

Omalizumab prevents anaphylaxis and improves symptoms in systemic mastocytosis: Efficacy and safety observations

期刊

ALLERGY
卷 73, 期 1, 页码 230-238

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/all.13237

关键词

anaphylaxis; KIT D816V; mast cell disorders; mastocytosis; omalizumab; systemic mastocytosis; tryptase

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BackgroundPatients with systemic mastocytosis (SM) may suffer from mast cell (MC) mediator-related symptoms insufficiently controlled by conventional therapy. Omalizumab is an established treatment in other MC-driven diseases, but experiences in SM are limited. ObjectiveTo assess the efficacy and safety of omalizumab in SM. MethodsIn our patient cohort, we evaluated all SM patients treated with omalizumab. A physician global assessment of type and severity of symptoms was performed at baseline, at 3 and 6months and at latest follow-up. Quality of life was assessed by visual analogue scale. S-tryptase and KIT D816V allele burden were monitored. ResultsA total of 14 adult SM patients (10 ISM, 2 BMM, 1 SSM, and 1 ASM-AHN) received omalizumab with a median duration of 17months (range: 1-73months). One patient was excluded due to concomitant cytoreductive therapy. In the remaining 13 patients, we observed a significant reduction in symptoms, with complete symptom control in five (38.5%), major response in three (23.1%), and a partial response in three (23.1%) patients, whereas two patients (15.4%) withdrew due to subjective side-effects at first dose. The treatment was most effective for recurrent anaphylaxis and skin symptoms, less for gastrointestinal, musculoskeletal, and neuropsychiatric symptoms. Patient-reported quality of life showed significant improvement. No significant changes in s-tryptase/KIT D816V allele burden were observed. No severe adverse events were recorded. ConclusionsOmalizumab appears to be a promising treatment option in SM, effectively preventing anaphylaxis and improving chronic MC mediator-related symptoms, insufficiently controlled by conventional therapy. Controlled studies are needed to substantiate findings.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据