4.8 Article

Synaptic Suppression Triplet-STDP Learning Rule Realized in Second-Order Memristors

期刊

ADVANCED FUNCTIONAL MATERIALS
卷 28, 期 5, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/adfm.201704455

关键词

leaky-integrate-and-fire neurons; second-order memristors; synapses; triplet-STDP

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51772112, 51372094, 61374150]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [HUST: 2016YXZD058]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The synaptic weight modification depends not only on interval of the pre-/postspike pairs according to spike-timing dependent plasticity (classical pair-STDP), but also on the timing of the preceding spike (triplet-STDP). Triplet-STDP reflects the unavoidable interaction of spike pairs in natural spike trains through the short-term suppression effect of preceding spikes. Second-order memristors with one state variable possessing short-term dynamics work in a way similar to the biological system. In this work, the suppression triplet-STDP learning rule is faithfully demonstrated by experiments and simulations using second-order memristors. Furthermore, a leaky-integrate-and-fire (LIF) neuron is simulated using a circuit constructed with second-order memristors. Taking the advantage of the LIF neuron, various neuromimetic dynamic processes, including local graded potential leaking out, postsynaptic impulse generation and backpropagation, and synaptic weight modification according to the suppression triplet-STDP rule, are realized. The realized weight-dependent pair- and triplet-STDP rules are clearly in line with findings in biology. The physically realized triplet-STDP rule is powerful in developing direction and speed selectivity for complex pattern recognition and tracking tasks. These scalable artificial synapses and neurons realized in second-order memristors can intrinsically capture the neuromimetic dynamic processes; they are the promising building blocks for constructing brain-inspired computation systems.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据