4.7 Article

Optimization and comparison of miniaturized extraction techniques for PAHs from crude oil exposed Atlantic cod and haddock eggs

期刊

ANALYTICAL AND BIOANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 408, 期 4, 页码 1023-1032

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00216-015-9225-x

关键词

Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons; Crude oil; Fish eggs; Purification; Solid phase extraction; Dispersive SPE

资金

  1. Norwegian Research Council [234367]
  2. Erasmus Mundus program EMQAL

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Two miniaturized extraction methods for a wide range of 2-6 ring polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and their alkylated homologues in small lipid-rich biota samples (a parts per thousand currency sign100 mg) have been developed. Both methods utilize liquid extraction (LE) prior to a clean-up step using either normal phase solid phase extraction (SPE) or mixed-phase dispersive SPE (dSPE). Optimization of the methods was achieved by comparing the type and amount of sorbents, drying agents, and solvents used. In order to improve the limits of detection (LOD) of target PAHs under high sensitivity gas chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry analysis, specific emphasis was given to minimizing lipid co-extraction. The optimized LE-SPE method comprised extraction with dichloromethane/n-hexane (1:1, v/v) and clean-up by silica SPE, whereas the optimized LE-dSPE method comprised extraction with acetonitrile and clean-up with PSA and C18 sorbents. The methods were validated and directly compared through the analysis of Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua) and haddock (Melanogrammus aeglefinus) eggs exposed to oil. The LE-SPE method resulted in lower levels of co-extracted lipids (14.1 +/- 1.7 ng/mu L) than the LE-dSPE method (60 +/- 14 ng/mu L). Achieved PAH LODs for the LE-SPE method were typically an order of magnitude lower (< 5 ng/g) than for the LE-dSPE method (< 125 ng/g). The LE-SPE method offers the possibility for PAH analysis of small samples of fish eggs (similar to 100 mg) exposed to small quantities of crude oil (similar to 1-10 mu g/L total PAHs).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据