4.5 Article

Quantitative Analysis of the Nanopore Translocation Dynamics of Simple Structured Polynucleotides

期刊

BIOPHYSICAL JOURNAL
卷 102, 期 1, 页码 85-95

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2011.11.4011

关键词

-

资金

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [SFB 248, SFB 863]
  2. Cluster of Excellence Nanoinitiative Munich
  3. Bundesministerium fur Bildung und Forschung (BMBF) [13N10970]
  4. Studienstiftung des Deutschen Volkes

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Nanopore translocation experiments are increasingly applied to probe the secondary structures of RNA and DNA molecules. Here, we report two vital steps toward establishing nanopore translocation as a tool for the systematic and quantitative analysis of polynucleotide folding: 1), Using alpha-hemolysin pores and a diverse set of different DNA hairpins, we demonstrate that backward nanopore force spectroscopy is particularly well suited for quantitative analysis. In contrast to forward translocation from the vestibule side of the pore, backward translocation times do not appear to be significantly affected by pore-DNA interactions. 2), We develop and verify experimentally a versatile mesoscopic theoretical framework for the quantitative analysis of translocation experiments with structured polynucleotides. The underlying model is based on sequence-dependent free energy landscapes constructed using the known thermodynamic parameters for polynucleotide basepairing. This approach limits the adjustable parameters to a small set of sequence-independent parameters. After parameter calibration, the theoretical model predicts the translocation dynamics of new sequences. These predictions can be leveraged to generate a baseline expectation even for more complicated structures where the assumptions underlying the one-dimensional free energy landscape may no longer be satisfied. Taken together, backward translocation through alpha-hemolysin pores combined with mesoscopic theoretical modeling is a promising approach for label-free single-molecule analysis of DNA and RNA folding.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据