4.3 Article

Bidirectional Associations Between Adiposity, Sedentary Behavior, and Physical Activity: A Longitudinal Study in Children

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL ACTIVITY & HEALTH
卷 15, 期 12, 页码 918-926

出版社

HUMAN KINETICS PUBL INC
DOI: 10.1123/jpah.2018-0011

关键词

obesity; objectively measured; childhood; fat mass

资金

  1. Gateshead Health National Health Service Foundation Trust
  2. Gateshead Education Authority
  3. Scottish Government Chief Scientist Office [CZH/4/484, CZH/4/979]
  4. UK National Prevention Research Initiative [GO501306]
  5. Gateshead PCT
  6. Henry Smith Charity and Sport Aiding Medical Research for Kids
  7. National Institute of Health Research
  8. MRC [G0501306] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Previous studies have reported on the associations between obesity and sedentary behavior (SB) or physical activity (PA) in children. This study examined longitudinal and bidirectional associations between adiposity and SB and PA in children. Methods: Participants were 356 children in England. PA was measured at 7 and 9 years of age using accelerometry. Outcome and exposures were time in SB and PAs and concurrent body mass index z score and fat index (FI). Results: Adiposity at baseline was positively associated with changes in SB (ss = 0.975 for FI) and negatively associated with changes in moderate to vigorous PA (ss = -0.285 for body mass index z score, ss = -0.607 for FI), vigorous PA (ss = -0.095 for FI), and total PA (ss = -48.675 for FI), but not vice versa. The changes in SB, moderate to vigorous PA, and total PA for children with overweight/obesity were significantly more adverse than those for children with healthy weight. Conclusions: A high body mass index z score or high body fatness at baseline was associated with lower moderate to vigorous PA and vigorous PA after 2 years, but not vice versa, which suggests that in this cohort adiposity influenced PA and SB, but the associations between adiposity and SB or PA were not bidirectional.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据