4.7 Article

Comparative study of Pb(II) adsorption onto MIL-101 and Fe-MIL-101 from aqueous solutions

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jece.2018.06.021

关键词

Pb(II) adsorption; MIL-101; Fe-MIL-101; Endothermic process

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In the present paper, the metal-organic framework-101 (MIL-101) and the iron-doped MIL-101 (Fe-MIL-101) were synthesised using the hydrothermal process. The obtained materials were characterised by means of X-ray diffraction, scanning electron microscopy, and nitrogen adsorption/desorption isotherms. The obtained Fe-MIL-101possessed MIL-101's structure with a large specific areas (2407 m(2) g(-1) for Fe-MIL-101and 3360 m(2) g(-1) for MIL-101). MIL-101 and Fe-MIL-101 were used for Pb(II) adsorption from aqueous solutions. Various factors affecting adsorption, namely contact time, initial concentration, temperature, pH, and adsorbent recycling were investigated. The Arrhenius and Eyring equations were employed to calculate the kinetic parameters, viz. activation energy (E-a), enthalpy (Delta H-#), entropy (Delta S-#), and free energy (Delta G(#)) of the sorption process. The thermodynamic parameters, namely changes in standard Gibbs free energy (Delta G(0)), enthalpy (Delta H-0) and entropy (Delta S-0) were derived to predict the nature of the process. The equilibrium data of adsorption of Pb(II) onto MIL-101 and Fe-MIL-101 were well fitted to both Langmuir and Freundlich isotherms. The maximum monolayer adsorption capacity of Fe-MIL-101(86.20 mg.g(-1)) was much higher than that of MIL-101(57.96 mg g(-1)). It was considered that MIL-101 containing iron provided a much larger adsorption capacity and faster adsorption kinetics than MIL-101. The carboxyl group in the MIL-101 framework played a vital role for the effective Pb(II) removal from aqueous solutions, while the surface functional groups being responsible for the Pb(II) adsorption on Fe-MIL-101 were considered to be hydroxy groups that formed on the iron oxide.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据