4.5 Article

Water Permeability of Aquaporin-4 Channel Depends on Bilayer Composition, Thickness, and Elasticity

期刊

BIOPHYSICAL JOURNAL
卷 103, 期 9, 页码 1899-1908

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2012.09.025

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland [GM27278]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aquaporin-4 (AQP4) is the primary water channel in the mammalian brain, particularly abundant in astrocytes, whose plasma membranes normally contain high concentrations of cholesterol. Here we test the hypothesis that the water permeabilities of two naturally occurring isoforms (AQP4-M1 and AQP4-M23) depend on bilayer mechanical/structural properties modulated by cholesterol and phospholipid composition. Osmotic stress measurements were performed with proteoliposomes containing AQP4 and three different lipid mixtures: 1), phosphatidylcholine (PC) and phosphatidylglycerol (PG); 2), PC, PG, with 40 mol% cholesterol; and 3), sphingomyelin (SM), PG, with 40 mol % cholesterol. The unit permeabilities of AQP4-M1 were 3.3 +/- 0.4 x 10(-13) cm(3)/s (mean +/- SE), 1.2 +/- 0.1 x 10(-13) cm(3)/s, and 0.4 +/- 0.1 x 10(-13) cm(3)/s in PC:PG, PC:PG:cholesterol, and SM:PG:cholesterol, respectively. The unit permeabilities of AQP4-M23 were 2.1 +/- 0.2 x 10(-13) cm(3)/s, 0.8 +/- 0.1 x 10(-13) cm(3)/s, and 0.3 +/- 0.1 x 10(-13) cm(3)/s in PC:PG, PC:PG:cholesterol, and SM:PG:cholesterol, respectively. Thus, for each isoform the unit permeabilities strongly depended on bilayer composition and systematically decreased with increasing bilayer compressibility modulus and bilayer thickness. These observations suggest that altering lipid environment provides a means of regulating water channel permeability. Such permeability changes could have physiological consequences, because AQP4 water permeability would be reduced by its sequestration into SM:cholesterol-enriched raft microdomains. Conversely, under ischemic conditions astrocyte membrane cholesterol content decreases, which could increase AQP4 permeability.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据