4.5 Article

Cofilin-Linked Changes in Actin Filament Flexibility Promote Severing

期刊

BIOPHYSICAL JOURNAL
卷 101, 期 1, 页码 151-159

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2011.05.049

关键词

-

资金

  1. American Heart Association [0940075N, 09PRE2230014]
  2. National Institutes of Health [GM071688, GM071688-03S1]
  3. Agence Nationale de la Recherche [ANR-08-Blanc-0012]
  4. United States Public Health Service [USPHS GM077190]
  5. National Science Foundation [MCB-0546353]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The actin regulatory protein, cofilin, increases the bending and twisting elasticity of actin filaments and severs them. It has been proposed that filaments partially decorated with cofilin accumulate stress from thermally driven shape fluctuations at bare (stiff) and decorated (compliant) boundaries, thereby promoting severing. This mechanics-based severing model predicts that changes in actin filament compliance due to cofilin binding affect severing activity. Here, we test this prediction by evaluating how the severing activities of vertebrate and yeast cofilactin scale with the flexural rigidities determined from analysis of shape fluctuations. Yeast actin filaments are more compliant in bending than vertebrate actin filaments. Severing activities of cofilactin isoforms correlate with changes in filament flexibility. Vertebrate cofilin binds but does not increase the yeast actin filament flexibility, and does not sever them. Imaging of filament thermal fluctuations reveals that severing events are associated with local bending and fragmentation when deformations attain a critical angle. The critical severing angle at boundaries between bare and cofilin-decorated segments is smaller than in bare or fully decorated filaments. These measurements support a cofilin-severing mechanism in which mechanical asymmetry promotes local stress accumulation and fragmentation at boundaries of bare and cofilin-decorated segments, analogous to failure of some nonprotein materials.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据