4.5 Article

Bilayer-Mediated Clustering and Functional Interaction of MscL Channels

期刊

BIOPHYSICAL JOURNAL
卷 100, 期 5, 页码 1252-1260

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2011.01.023

关键词

-

资金

  1. Australian Research Council
  2. National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia
  3. D-lab (Grenoble, France)
  4. Institut Laue-Langevin (Grenoble, France)
  5. ISIS (Didcot, UK)
  6. DFG-Center for Functional Nanostructures
  7. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [GR/R99393/01, EP/C015452/1]
  8. European Union [RII3-CT-2003-505925]
  9. National Institutes of Health [GM075000]
  10. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/C015452/1, EP/E000290/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  11. EPSRC [EP/C015452/1, EP/E000290/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Mechanosensitive channels allow bacteria to respond to osmotic stress by opening a nanometer-sized pore in the cellular membrane. Although the underlying mechanism has been thoroughly studied on the basis of individual channels, the behavior of channel ensembles has yet to be elucidated. This work reveals that mechanosensitive channels of large conductance (MscL) exhibit a tendency to spatially cluster, and demonstrates the functional relevance of clustering. We evaluated the spatial distribution of channels in a lipid bilayer using patch-clamp electrophysiology, fluorescence and atomic force microscopy, and neutron scattering and reflection techniques, coupled with mathematical modeling of the mechanics of a membrane crowded with proteins. The results indicate that MscL forms clusters under a wide range of conditions. MscL is closely packed within each cluster but is still active and mechanosensitive. However, the channel activity is modulated by the presence of neighboring proteins, indicating membrane-mediated protein-protein interactions. Collectively, these results suggest that MscL self-assembly into channel clusters plays an osmoregulatory functional role in the membrane.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据