4.7 Article

Decolourisation and degradation of azo dyes by mixed fungal culture consisted of Dichotomomyces cejpii MRCH 1-2 and Phoma tropica MRCH 1-3

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jece.2017.12.035

关键词

Azo dye; Textile industry effluent; Microbial mixed culture; Congored; Methylred

资金

  1. Environmental Biotechnology task force, Department of Biotechnology (DBT), Ministry of Science and Technology, Government of India [BT/PR7518/BCE/8/994/2013]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Azo dyes are extensively used in textile processing industry, which are resistant to degradation and persist in soil for long time due to its fused aromatic structure. Aim of this study was to identify the azo dye compound accumulated in soil and screening of native azo dye degrading microorganisms. Azo dyes present in the soil sample were identified using high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). Selective isolation of azo dye degrading microorganism was done using the minimal medium supplemented with azo dye (50 mg/L). The isolates were identified and tested as individual and as mixed cultures for azo dye decolourisation and degradation. Azo dye degradation pathway by the fungal cultures were assessed through GC-MS. HPLC analysis of soil samples indicated the presence of various azo dyes such as congored, methylred and reactive dyes. Dichotomomyces cejpii MRCH 1-2 plus Phoma tropica MRCH 1-3 exhibited maximum congored (48.7 +/- 0.66 mg/ L out of 50 mg/L), methylred (43.57 +/- 1.07 mg/L out of 50 mg/L) and reactive blue (45.3 2.7 mg/L out of 50 mg/L) degradation compared to other treatments. Response surface methodology analysis was used to optimise the culture condition for effective azo dye degradation. The possible azo dye degradation pathway by the fungal mixed culture and enzyme involved was illustrated in this study. Fungal mixed culture Dichotomomyces cejpii MRCH 1-2 and Phoma tropica MRCH 1-3 may be recommended for azo dye decolourisation as well as degradation in the textile industrial effluent

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据