4.7 Article

Physicochemical and toxicological evaluation of silica nanoparticles suitable for food and consumer products collected by following the EC recommendation

期刊

ANALYTICAL AND BIOANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 408, 期 1, 页码 271-286

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00216-015-9101-8

关键词

Silica nanoparticles; Food additives; Surface analysis; In vitro tests; Differential centrifugal sedimentation (DCS); Sedimentation field flow fractionation (SdFFF)

资金

  1. QualityNano Project - European Community Research Infrastructures under the F7 Capacities Programme, University of Namur [INFRA-2010-262163]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Specific information about the particle size distribution, agglomeration state, morphology, and chemical composition of four silica samples, used as additives in food and in personal care products, were achieved with a combination of analytical techniques. The combined use of differential centrifugal sedimentation (DCS), sedimentation field flow fractionation (SdFFF), and scanning and transmission electron microscopy (SEM and TEM) allows to classify the water dispersed samples as nanomaterials according to the EC definition. The mechanical stirring and the ultrasound treatment were compared as dispersion methods. The particle surface chemical composition, determined by particle-induced X-ray emission (PIXE) and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), assessed the different levels of purity between the pyrogenic and the precipitated silica and highlighted particle surface chemical composition modifications in the outer shell when dispersed by mechanical stirring. The potential toxic effects of silica on intestinal Caco-2 cells were investigated using MTS assay and by measuring lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) release and caspases 3/7 activity after 24 h of incubation. No or limited decrease of cell viability was observed for all particles regardless of dispersion procedure, suggesting a relative innocuity of these silica samples.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据