4.7 Article

p53 Mutant p53(N236S) Induces Neural Tube Defects in Female Embryos

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES
卷 15, 期 9, 页码 2006-2015

出版社

IVYSPRING INT PUBL
DOI: 10.7150/ijbs.31451

关键词

p53(N236S); neural tube defects; H3K27me3

资金

  1. Research Foundation of Health Department of Yunnan Province [2016NS227]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The p53 is one of the most important tumor suppressors through surveillance of DNA damages and abnormal proliferation signals, and activation the cell cycle arrest and apoptosis in response to stress. However, the mutation of p53 is known to be oncogenic by both loss of function in inhibiting cell cycle progress and gain of function in promoting abnormal proliferation. In the present study, we have established a knock in mouse model containing an Asn-to-Ser substitution at p53 amino acid 236 by homologous recombination (p53N236S). Other than tumorigenesis phenotype, we found that p53(S/S) mice displayed female-specific phenotype of open neural tube in brain (exencephaly) and spinal cord (spina bifida). The occurrence rate for embryonic exencephaly is 68.5% in female p53(S/S) mice, which is much more than that of in p53(-/-) mice (37.1%) in the same genetic background. Further study found that p53(N236S) mutation increased neuronal proliferation and decreased neuronal differentiation and apoptosis. To rescue the phenotype, we inhibited cell proliferation by crossing Wrn(-/-) mice with p53(S/S) mice. The occurrence of NTDs in p53(S/S) Wrn(-/-) mice was 38%, thus suggesting that the inhibition of cell proliferation through a Wrn defect partially rescued the exencephaly phenotype in p53(S/S) mice. We also report that p53S decreased expression of UTX at mRNA and protein level via increasing Xist transcript, result in high female-specific H3K27me3 expression and repressed Mash 1 transcription, which facilitating abnormal proliferation, differentiation, and apoptosis, result in the mis-regulation of neurodevelopment and neural tube defects (NTDs).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据