3.8 Article

Subjective cognitive concern in multiple sclerosis is associated with reduced thalamic and cortical gray matter volumes

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/2055217319827618

关键词

Subjective cognitive concern; multiple sclerosis; gray matter; metacognition; quantitative MRI; atrophy

资金

  1. COPIC Medical Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: Brain atrophy has been correlated with objective cognitive dysfunction in multiple sclerosis but few studies have explored self-reported subjective cognitive concerns and their relationship to brain volume changes. This study explores the relationship between subjective cognitive concerns in multiple sclerosis and reduced brain volume in regions of interest implicated in cognitive dysfunction. Methods: A total of 158 patients with multiple sclerosis completed the Quality of Life in Neurologic Disorders Measures (Neuro-QoL) short forms to assess subjective cognitive concerns and underwent brain magnetic resonance imaging. Regional brain volumes from regions of interest implicated in cognitive dysfunction were measured using NeuroQuant automated volumetric quantitation. Linear regression was used to analyze the relationship between subjective cognitive concerns and brain volume. Results: Controlling for age, disease duration, gender, depression and fatigue, increased subjective cognitive concerns were associated with reduced thalamic volume (standardized beta = 0.223, t(150) = 2.406, P = 0.017) and reduced cortical gray matter volume (standardized beta = 0.240, t(150) = 2.777, P = 0.006). Increased subjective cognitive concerns were not associated with any other regions of interest that were analyzed. Conclusions: Subjective cognitive concern in MS is associated with reduced thalamic and cortical gray matter volumes, areas of the brain that have been implicated in objective cognitive impairment. These findings may lend neuroanatomical significance to subjective cognitive concerns and patient-reported outcomes as measured by Neuro-QoL.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据