4.1 Review

Detection rate of radiolabelled choline PET or PET/CT in hepatocellular carcinoma: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis

期刊

CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL IMAGING
卷 7, 期 4, 页码 237-253

出版社

SPRINGER-VERLAG ITALIA SRL
DOI: 10.1007/s40336-019-00332-5

关键词

PET; Positron emission tomography; Choline; Hepatocellular carcinoma; Liver; Meta-analysis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background Different imaging methods have been used to detect hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). As there are increasing literature data about the role of radiolabelled choline PET/CT in this setting, we aimed to perform an updated meta-analysis about the detection rate (DR) of this imaging method in HCC. Methods A comprehensive computer literature search of studies published through December 2018 in PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane library databases regarding the DR of radiolabelled choline PET or PET/CT in patients with HCC was carried out. Pooled DR were calculated on a per patient- and on a per lesion-based analysis. Subgroup analyses taking into account the radiopharmaceutical used were performed. Results Nine studies (283 HCC patients) were included in the pooled analysis. The pooled DR of radiolabelled choline PET or PET/CT on a per patient- and on a per lesion-based analysis was 83% [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 75-89%] and 79% (95% CI 72-86%), respectively. A significant heterogeneity among the studies was found on a per lesion-based analysis only. No significant publication bias was found. The subgroup analysis demonstrated a trend towards a higher DR when using F-18-choline compared to C-11-choline, without a statistically significant difference. Pooled DR of HCC using dual-tracer PET/CT (radiolabelled choline and F-18-FDG) on a per patient- and a per lesion-based analysis was 91% (95% CI 87-95%) and 89% (95% CI 80-95%), respectively, without significant heterogeneity. Conclusions Radiolabelled choline PET/CT demonstrated good ability in detecting HCC. The DR increased when dual-tracer PET/CT was performed. Large multicenter studies and cost-effectiveness analyses are warranted.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据