4.7 Article

Singles correlation energy contributions in solids

期刊

JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS
卷 143, 期 10, 页码 -

出版社

AIP Publishing
DOI: 10.1063/1.4929346

关键词

-

资金

  1. Austrian Science Fund (FWF) within the Spezialforschungsbereich Vienna Computational Materials Laboratory (SFB ViCoM) [F41]
  2. Deutsche Forschungsgruppe Research Unit [FOR 1346]
  3. MetaCentrum [LM2010005]
  4. CERIT-SC under program Centre CERIT Scientific Cloud part of the Operational Program Research and Development for Innovations [CZ.1.05/3.2.00/08.0144]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The random phase approximation to the correlation energy often yields highly accurate results for condensed matter systems. However, ways how to improve its accuracy are being sought and here we explore the relevance of singles contributions for prototypical solid state systems. We set out with a derivation of the random phase approximation using the adiabatic connection and fluctuation dissipation theorem, but contrary to the most commonly used derivation, the density is allowed to vary along the coupling constant integral. This yields results closely paralleling standard perturbation theory. We re-derive the standard singles of Gorling-Levy perturbation theory [A. Gorling and M. Levy, Phys. Rev. A 50, 196 (1994)], highlight the analogy of our expression to the renormalized singles introduced by Ren and coworkers [Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 153003 (2011)], and introduce a new approximation for the singles using the density matrix in the random phase approximation. We discuss the physical relevance and importance of singles alongside illustrative examples of simple weakly bonded systems, including rare gas solids (Ne, Ar, Xe), ice, adsorption of water on NaCl, and solid benzene. The effect of singles on covalently and metallically bonded systems is also discussed. (C) 2015 Author(s). All article content, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据