3.8 Article

Satisfaction of Outpatient Service Consumers and Associated Factors Towards the Health Service Given at Jimma Medical Center, South West Ethiopia

期刊

PATIENT-RELATED OUTCOME MEASURES
卷 10, 期 -, 页码 347-354

出版社

DOVE MEDICAL PRESS LTD
DOI: 10.2147/PROM.S220404

关键词

client satisfaction; health care service; outpatient; Jimma

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Client satisfaction reflects the gap between the expected service and the experience of the services from the client's point of view. As patient satisfaction is considered to be a healthcare outcome and predictor of treatment utilization and adherence to the care and support, assessment of the level of patient satisfaction is vital. Objective: To assess satisfaction of outpatient service and its associated factors toward the health service given among outpatients at Jimma medical center, southern western Ethiopia, 2019. Methods: An institutional-based cross-sectional study design was employed at Jimma Medical center from May 1 to May 30, 2019 GC. The respondents were selected by systematic random sampling method. The data were cleaned, coded, interred into EPI data version 3.1 and transferred and analyzed using SPSS version 23. Descriptive statistics was used to summarize the data. Binary logistic regressions were used to analyze the association between dependent and independent variables. A P-value <0.05 was considered significant. Results: A total of 284 respondents were included in the study with a response rate of 96.6%, from which 174 (61.3%) were male and 183 (64.4%) were Oromo by ethnicity. The overall satisfaction was 79 (27.8%) (CI = 20.0-30.4). Satisfaction was high if the patients had kept their privacy (AOR = 13.332; 95% CI = 2.282-77.905) and understandability of the patient problem (AOR = 21.830; 95% CI = 0.054-77.500). Conclusion: The overall satisfaction level of the patients is low, so this demands the hospital to take further action on the identified problems to improve the services delivered to the patients.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据