4.5 Article

Coclustering of ErbB1 and ErbB2 Revealed by FRET-Sensitized Acceptor Bleaching

期刊

BIOPHYSICAL JOURNAL
卷 99, 期 1, 页码 105-114

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2010.03.061

关键词

-

资金

  1. Hungarian Scientific Research Fund [K72677, K68763, K62648]
  2. National Office for Research and Technology [NKTH EA-0888-005/2010]
  3. European Commission [LSHC-CT-2005-018914]
  4. New Hungary Development Plan
  5. European Social Fund
  6. European Regional Development Fund [TAMOP-4.2.2-08/1-2008-0019]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Classical theory states that ligand binding induces the dimerization of ErbB proteins, leading to their activation. Although we and other investigators have shown the existence of preformed homoclusters of ErbB receptors and analyzed their composition, the stoichiometry of their heteroclusters has not been quantitatively described. Here, we report the development of the fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET)-sensitized acceptor bleaching (FSAB) technique to quantitate the ratio of ErbB1 and ErbB2 in their heteroclusters. In FSAB, photolabile acceptors within FRET distance from photostable donors are excited and photobleached by FRET, and the fraction of acceptors that are participating in FRET is determined. In quiescent SKBR-3 breast cancer cells, similar to 35% of ErbB1 and similar to 10% of ErbB2 have been found in heteroclusters. Epidermal growth factor (ligand of ErbB1) increased the fraction of ErbB2 heteroclustering with ErbB1, whereas the ratio of heteroclustered ErbB1 did not change significantly. The fractions of heteroclustered ErbB1 and ErbB2 were independent of their expression levels, indicating that the formation of these clusters is not driven by the law of mass action. In contrast, the FRET efficiency depended on the donor/acceptor ratio as expected. We present a model in which preformed receptor clusters are rearranged upon ligand stimulation, and report that the composition of these clusters can be quantitatively described by the FSAB technique.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据