4.5 Article

Microbiomes in Ground Water and Alternative Irrigation Water, and Spinach Microbiomes Impacted by Irrigation with Different Types of Water

期刊

PHYTOBIOMES JOURNAL
卷 3, 期 2, 页码 137-147

出版社

AMER PHYTOPATHOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1094/PBIOMES-09-18-0037-R

关键词

bacteriology; ecology; ground water; irrigation; microbial community; microbiome; roof-harvest water; spinach; waste water

资金

  1. USDA-ARS
  2. Wilson College [58-1245-4-068]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Irrigation water, particularly if applied overhead, could be an important source of bacterial contamination to fresh produce. The colonization, survival, and proliferation of exogenous bacterial pathogens can be strongly influenced by the produce microbiota. In this study, spinach grown in an organic field was irrigated with ground water and potential alternative irrigation water including reclaimed wastewater, and urban runoff water, over a period of 2 weeks. Water and spinach samples were collected before and after irrigation for bacterial plate count, qPCR, and community profiling using 16S rDNA high-throughput sequencing analyses. The average bacterial population densities on spinach (6.50 +/- 0.04 log CFU/g, 7.40 +/- 0.10 log 16S copies/g) were significantly higher than those in irrigation water (3.61 +/- 0.12 log CFU/ml, 4.94 +/- 0.13 log 16S copies/ml). The composition and relative abundance of spinach microbiomes varied with different types of irrigation waters; however, the most abundant microbial taxa on spinach were not significantly affected by the irrigation with different types of water. Shigella, Salmonella, Listeria, Campytobacter spp., and pathogenic Escherichia coli were not detected in this study. This study provides information on the microbial ecology of diverse bacterial communities on spinach surface after irrigation by different types of water, which can benefit future studies on the interaction of microbes on produce, and the prevention of foodborne pathogens and plant disease.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据