4.3 Article

ASSESSMENT OF PLANT COMMUNITIES AND IDENTIFICATION OF INDICATOR SPECIES OF AN ECOTONAL FOREST ZONE AT DURAND LINE, DISTRICT KURRAM, PAKISTAN

期刊

APPLIED ECOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH
卷 17, 期 3, 页码 6375-6396

出版社

CORVINUS UNIV BUDAPEST
DOI: 10.15666/aeer/1703_63756396

关键词

Indicators of Transitional Zone; Kurram Agency at Pak Afghan Border; Edaphic Factors

资金

  1. Deanship of Scientific Research at King Saud University [RG-1435-014]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

There must be unique indicator vegetation at Ecotonal Zone in the border region of Pakistan and Afghanistan. Keeping this hypothesis in mind the forest zone of District Kurram at Durand Line was ecologically surveyed. Stations were established, GPS readings, environmental gradients were recorded and soil samples were collected. Data was statistically analysed using PC-ORD version-5 and CANOCO version-4.5. Indicator Species Analysis (ISA), constancy and fidelity level were used to find indicator species of communities. Preliminary results showed that study area hosts 195 vascular plant species belonging to 145 genera and 60 families. Cluster Analysis classified vegetation into four plant communities; (a) Elaeagnus angustifolia-Rosa chinensis-Seriphidium kurramense (b) Platanus orientalis-Rosa moschata - Epilobium hirsutum (c) Quercus baloot - Jasminum auriculatum-Foeniculum vulgare (d) Quercus dilatata-Hedera nepalensis-Calamintha umbrosa. Nitrogen, Sodium and Potassium were the strongest Physico-chemical factors (P <= 0.05) determining plant communities composition. Interestingly, Vincetoxicum cardiostephanum was reported as narrow endemic species. Distinguished indicator species had significant environmental preferences. Variables like grazing and fodder chopping were the major vegetation drivers. Altitude was one of the most important determinants, influencing directly species distribution; Current study could be potentially used elsewhere for vegetation management and conservation strategies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据