4.7 Article

Antidiabetic effects and underlying mechanisms of anti-digestive dietary polysaccharides fromSargassum fusiformein rats

期刊

FOOD & FUNCTION
卷 11, 期 8, 页码 7023-7036

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d0fo01166e

关键词

-

资金

  1. State Key Research and Development Plan [2017YFD0400200]
  2. Guangdong Natural Science Foundation for Distinguished Young Scholar [2019B151502040]
  3. Guangzhou Science and Technology Plan Project [201710010060]
  4. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2019ZD36]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Sargassum fusiformepolysaccharides (SFP), an anti-digestive biologically active ingredient obtained fromSargassum fusiformeby ultrasound-assisted enzymatic extraction, have been proven to exhibit extremely strong alpha-glucosidase inhibitory activity. In the current research, the potential anti-diabetic effects and molecular mechanisms of SFP were investigated by classic biochemical analysis, high-throughput sequencing and molecular biology techniques in type 2 diabetic rats. The analysis of typical diabetic symptoms and serum profiles showed that oral administration of SFP could mitigate hyperglycemia, hyperinsulinemia, dyslipidemia and oxidative stress in diabetic rats. SFP also promoted glycogen synthesis in the liver and skeletal muscles. H&E staining observation confirmed that SFP intervention could partially repair liver and muscle injuries caused by diabetes. Moreover, 16S rRNA gene sequencing analysis indicated that SFP treatment could distinctly restore the beneficial composition of gut flora in diabetic rats. Furthermore, RT-qPCR analysis revealed that anti-diabetic effects of SFP may be closely related to accelerating the absorption and utilization of blood glucose in the liver and muscle and inhibiting hepatic glucose production. In short, this study demonstrated that SFP could be developed as functional foods or pharmaceutical supplements for the prevention or mitigation of diabetes and its complications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据